Randy Mellaerts, Director of the Impact Licensing Initiative

Impact Licen­sing Initia­tive: From protec­ting intellec­tual property to working for the good of society

The Impact Licensing Initiative wants technology to benefit humanity and the planet. Director Randy Mellaerts explains how the owner of the technology can use impact licensing to generate economic returns and achieve social impact.

What is the aim of Impact Licen­sing Initiative?

We live in times of rapid tech­no­lo­gi­cal ( r )evolu­ti­ons. The chall­enge is to embed these deve­lo­p­ments into commu­ni­ties and society in a way that fosters aliveness, not in a way that redu­ces human beings to data points. At ILI, we want tech­no­logy to serve huma­nity and the planet. And that goes beyond simply using tech­no­logy; it’s about crea­ting new ways of working toge­ther, foste­ring colla­bo­ra­tive lear­ning, and rethin­king how intellec­tual property rights contri­bute to socie­tal value.

You say that many tech­no­lo­gies that would promote sustainable deve­lo­p­ment are not yet being suffi­ci­ently used. Can you give us an example?

The ques­tion that we ask at ILI is: how can tech­no­lo­gies contri­bute to flou­ris­hing commu­ni­ties and a rege­ne­ra­tive planet? Sustaina­bi­lity is at the core of how we approach impact licen­sing. It’s about linking tech­no­logy to socie­tal value in an inten­tio­nal, measura­ble way. 

True impact happens when commu­ni­ties shape tech­no­logy to create meaningful value for themselves.

Randy Mellaerts, Direc­tor of the Impact Licen­sing Initiative

Take IKIC. It star­ted with a cooling tech­no­logy that was origi­nally deve­lo­ped for passive cold chains in food retail by a commer­cial company. But ILI saw a much bigger poten­tial and star­ted working with part­ners to adapt it for health appli­ca­ti­ons, espe­ci­ally in under­ser­ved regi­ons. Along the way, we disco­vered another urgent need: small-scale farmers in Ethio­pia and Sene­gal were strugg­ling because they lacked proper cold storage to keep milk fresh. Without it, they couldn’t get fair prices. This wasn’t just about tech­no­logy; it was about under­stan­ding local needs and working toge­ther to deve­lop tail­o­red solu­ti­ons. The core tech­no­logy was an enabler, but further inno­va­tion was needed to bridge the gaps. And that requi­res pati­ence, risk-taking, and real human connec­tion. True impact happens when commu­ni­ties shape tech­no­logy to create meaningful value for themselves.

You encou­rage tech­no­logy holders to engage in impact licen­sing. How does it work?

From a tech­no­logy holder’s perspec­tive, impact licen­sing is an inno­va­tive way to create value from intellec­tual property while balan­cing econo­mic returns and socie­tal impact. An important point to mention is that we define tech­no­logy broadly. It includes not just patents, but also metho­do­lo­gies, data, and approa­ches that require speci­fic savoir-faire. Very often, orga­niza­ti­ons such as compa­nies or foun­da­ti­ons are not aware of the poten­tial they have in that respect. An impact license is a time-bound permis­sion that allows a tech­no­logy owner to intro­duce intellec­tual property (whether a product, service, or process) to a defi­ned market for a speci­fic socie­tal purpose. It’s a hybrid approach to intellec­tual property, not fully public domain, but also not locked into conven­tio­nal proprie­tary models. 

Just as impact inves­t­ing crea­ted a space between tradi­tio­nal finance and phil­an­thropy, impact licen­sing opera­tes between conven­tio­nal licen­sing and compul­sory  licensing.

Randy Mellaerts

Just as impact inves­t­ing crea­ted a space between tradi­tio­nal finance and phil­an­thropy, impact licen­sing opera­tes between conven­tio­nal licen­sing and compul­sory  licen­sing. It enables ventures to work with tech­no­lo­gies with inten­tio­na­lity, ensu­ring they address real needs, gene­rate socie­tal value, and create equi­ta­ble returns. But for impact licen­sing to succeed, it needs the right part­ner­ships and human connec­tion. That’s ancho­red in our ethos at ILI, not just to support tech­no­logy holders, but to co-design the licen­sing approach and set up the colla­bo­ra­ti­ons needed to make it work. ILI also has its own impact invest­ment fund and works with a mix of finan­cial streams in a syste­mic way to support the scree­ning of tech­no­logy, co-create part­ner­ships for the common good, and further frugal inno­va­tion while conti­nuously foste­ring a lear­ning community.

How do you define and sepa­rate socie­tal markets from commer­cial ones?

The impact licen­sing agree­ment is key here. It estab­lishes a clear purpose for the tech­no­logy, detail­ing its inten­ded outco­mes and impact. Addi­tio­nally, it defi­nes the scope of its socie­tal markets by speci­fy­ing geogra­phic regi­ons, target audi­en­ces, and usage contexts. To ensure accoun­ta­bi­lity, it incor­po­ra­tes measura­ble key indi­ca­tors that assess the technology’s effec­ti­ve­ness in these areas. It’s a struc­tu­red yet flexi­ble approach. Impact licen­sing beco­mes meaningful in the context of, and as the result of, a co-design process that invol­ves all stake­hol­ders and inte­gra­tes multi­ple dimen­si­ons, inclu­ding intellec­tual property, value crea­tion, and social busi­ness model­ling. In many cases, we use social fran­chi­sing models to scale impact while stay­ing aligned with the inten­ded socie­tal purpose. And the agree­ment  also includes mecha­nisms to inte­grate lessons lear­ned, both from tech­ni­cal and socie­tal perspec­ti­ves. That way, we can conti­nuously adapt and refine how the tech­no­logy is embedded into commu­ni­ties and how value is created.

Do you have examp­les of successful projects?

Yes, quite a few! ILI is active in impact domains for health, clean energy, sustainable agri­cul­ture, educa­tion, and AI. I alre­ady mentio­ned IKIC. They provide cold chain solu­ti­ons for low-resource settings world­wide, ensu­ring a sustainable and scalable impact aligned with the UN Sustainable Deve­lo­p­ment Goals. Another is COOSHA, an orga­niza­tion deve­lo­ping rene­wa­ble hydro­gen solu­ti­ons. Their tech­no­logy gene­ra­tes hydro­gen from air and sunlight, allo­wing house­holds to cook with hydro­gen as an energy source in a way that’s healthy, afforda­ble, and envi­ron­men­tally friendly. Then there’s READ, an orga­ni­sa­tion tack­ling medi­ca­tion non-adhe­rence through low-tech smart health guides. They improve health liter­acy, moni­to­ring, and adhe­rence through their plat­form, helping to address a major global health challenge. 

They’re combi­ning arti­san craft­sman­ship with tech­no­logy to inno­vate in a sustainable way.

Randy Mellaerts

A final exam­ple I’ll give here is the Future Foot­wear Foun­da­tion, a non-profit orga­niza­tion working with indi­ge­nous commu­ni­ties to preserve tradi­tio­nal shoe­ma­king know­ledge while inte­gra­ting modern rese­arch on human move­ment. They’re combi­ning arti­san craft­sman­ship with tech­no­logy to inno­vate in a sustainable way. Each of these projects demons­tra­tes how impact licen­sing can drive tangi­ble change, scaling solu­ti­ons while main­tai­ning their social mission. In all these examp­les, ILI takes on the role of broker and faci­li­ta­tes the start of the purpose-orien­ted orga­niza­ti­ons with a clear mission lock. ILI also ensu­res that this mission lock is enforceable through legal mechanisms.

How do you measure the impact of these projects?

The impact license agree­ment plays a crucial role here. It includes quality moni­to­ring, accoun­ta­bi­lity measu­res, and safe­guards to ensure the tech­no­logy is used as inten­ded. If an IP isn’t being deployed effec­tively or drifts away from its socie­tal purpose, the license can be revo­ked. But measu­ring impact is more than ticking off prede­fi­ned KPI’s. It’s about colla­bo­ra­tive lear­ning. We bring toge­ther all stake­hol­ders – tech­no­logy holders, impact inves­tors, and prac­ti­tio­ners on the ground – to engage in an ongo­ing process of evalua­tion and adapt­a­tion. Rather than just track­ing numbers, we focus on refi­ning metho­do­lo­gies and ques­tio­ning assump­ti­ons through a trans­di­sci­pli­nary mind­set. Inde­pen­dent third-party assess­ments, such as by know­ledge insti­tu­tes active in the field, help to ensure credi­bi­lity, but it’s also about crea­ting a culture of learning. 

At the end of the day, we want to bridge the need for socie­tal impact with the oppor­tu­nity for conti­nuous innovation. 

Randy Mellaerts

At the end of the day, we want to bridge the need for socie­tal impact with the oppor­tu­nity for conti­nuous inno­va­tion. That’s why we embed impact measu­re­ment into our part­ner­ships and social fran­chi­sing models. It’s not just about checking boxes, but about ensu­ring long-term success through giving it an evolu­tio­nary flexi­bi­lity, so to speak.

How can orga­niza­ti­ons that want to use such tech­no­lo­gies get involved?

Reach out to us! The conver­sa­tion around IP is evol­ving: from protec­tion to putting it to work for socie­tal good. Switz­er­land, ranked No.1 in the EPO’s Inno­va­tion Index, has an oppor­tu­nity to contri­bute to this shift. ILI is setting up clea­ring houses across Europe and aims to do so in Switz­er­land. We focus on low- and middle-income count­ries and colla­bo­rate on global initia­ti­ves where impact licen­sing crea­tes value. We’re buil­ding a commu­nity of prac­tice through our Euro­pean project and welcome tech­no­logy holders, foun­da­ti­ons, non-profit orga­niza­ti­ons, phil­an­thro­pists, and impact inves­tors to explore how they can join the move­ment. It offers a unique oppor­tu­nity to drive systems change together.


More about Impact Licen­sing Initiative

StiftungSchweiz is committed to enabling a modern philanthropy that unites and excites people and has maximum impact with minimal time and effort.

Follow StiftungSchweiz on