Free­dom or secu­rity – an exis­ten­tial field of tension

It is a special feature of the management of associations, foundations and other NPOs that the greatest challenge lies in the organisation of the resource mix. The Fribourg Management Model for NPOs distinguishes eight fields of tension that shape management. The optimal mix of resources between self-determination and external support is one of the most economically relevant.

VERBANDSMANAGEMENT INSTITUT (VMI)

When an NPO is foun­ded, it choo­ses an objec­tive that it pursues accor­ding to its own ideas and using its own resour­ces. This expres­ses its demand for self-deter­mi­na­tion. In doing so, it expo­ses itself to its envi­ron­ment and often takes considera­ble risks – unless the orga­ni­sa­tion is finan­ci­ally strong from the outset and has a corre­spon­din­gly high level of trust.

Gain secu­rity, preserve self-governance

Many NPOs look for support from resourceful part­ners, for exam­ple by fulfil­ling tasks assi­gned by the state. Howe­ver, this rest­ricts their scope of action. Market finan­cing also raises simi­lar ques­ti­ons: should the NPO base its decis­i­ons on its own values and tradi­ti­ons? Or should it align itself with market demand and the expec­ta­ti­ons of its donors? This rest­ricts its auto­nomy, but gives it more certainty for its long-term deve­lo­p­ment. An NPO can hardly free itself from this area of tension by its own efforts, but must constantly search for an inner balance.

This can also be learnt, for exam­ple, in the VMI’s inten­sive course on ‘Effi­ci­ent resource manage­ment in NPOs’.