Version 4 of ChatGPT has just been launched, so it is entering the next stage. One of the new features is speech recognition. Now it’s possible to talk with artificial intelligence and receive an error-free, translated spoken reply at the touch of a button. AI can also tell stories in an emotional voice. This is just one example of the rapid evolution of such technologies. Will developments such as these make personal contact in fundraising – and thus the many young fundraisers who can be found in public places representing various aid organisations – superfluous?
A quarter of a century of face-to-face fundraising
Street campaigns to attract new members for aid organisations have been going on since 1995. Two students in Austria had the brilliant idea of directly addressing passers-by on the street, providing information and signing them up for memberships. Neither addressing people directly nor giving verbal information were revolutionary at the time; nor was the idea of memberships. The method’s success lies in combining all these measures. Measures that were previously practised individually or only partly in combination now all take place at the same time and in the same place. Suddenly, individual fundraising activities turned into a single campaign with long-term donations, thanks to self-renewing memberships via direct debit. Advertising methods were still completely ‘analogue’ in 1995 – there were no tablets, the success of the campaign could not be verified with figures, and even e‑mails were not yet very widespread.
Technology meets face-to-face conversation
Viewed from a distance, street campaigns still seem to function in exactly the same way today, as the focus is still on the person and the personal conversation. This is a good thing, because fortunately, no artificial intelligence can replace humans with their emotions, intuitions and imperfections. But even though the conversation takes place between two people, digitalisation has long since found its way into the information booth: presentations and videos on iPads have replaced analogue display folders. Data entries on the tablet are checked in real time. The success of each campaign can be analysed using various KPIs, both by the client and by the team leaders. The donors will automatically receive an SMS or e‑mail after the conclusion of the contract. Many organisations use sophisticated digital communication to continuously inspire newly recruited members to engage with their concerns and create a lasting connection. However, if someone decides not to become a member, the donation can be adjusted or cancelled online.
Recruitment for fundraisers for information booths – known as ‘dialoguers’ – is largely carried out by means of targeted advertisements on online platforms. An e‑learning platform is used for their training.
Humanity in fundraising
With the growth of artificial intelligence, it would be easy to think that human interactions were increasingly being pushed into the background and that sophisticated, measurable, controllable digital communication was superior. But the use of artificial intelligence in fundraising must be done with caution, as trust and authenticity form the foundation of every donation. AI-generated images, texts and videos may seem convincing at first glance, but they run the risk of disgracing an entire industry. ‘The more we live in technological worlds, the greater becomes the need for authenticity,’ fittingly observes philosopher Richard David Precht.
Making donations is a deep human need, feeding our instinct for solidarity, which needs to be awakened. Whether by e‑mail, letter, TV advert or at the information booth, ultimately it is always a direct message from people to people, for people. Although AI can generate perfect donor letters, their authenticity is quickly called into question. Fortunately, there are still dialoguers whose smiles bring passers-by to a standstill, and who make giving donations an easy and trustworthy process.